citable and freely accessible. Suppose you submit a paper and it is rejected with no suggestion of resubmission, but there is substantial feedback. Granted, any answers will be purely opinion-based, but that seems to be the case with many questions here. If a legitimate misunderstanding or error led the reviewers to recommend rejection, outline your points to the editor without belittling the reviewers or being argumentative. The original draft was in pretty bad shape, in hindsight, which partly explains phd
it, and I'm more experienced now. If you have received reviews of your manuscript, that information is very valuable. Chances are that some of the suggestions would improve your manuscript, even if some were mistaken. It comes across as a sign of weakness, like you've decided your paper probably can't be fixed and you'd better just submit it somewhere less prestigious/demanding. In such cases, remember that your time is important. Major revision decision after 6 months. Edit: For the record, I'm leaning in the direction of submission to another journal if initially rejected without the suggestion of resubmission. By refusing to acknowledge any of the changes that the first set of reviewers suggested, you are basically negating all the effort expended in that first round of review. A few options include appealing the decision, resubmitting, or finding a new journal. If you dont want to argue for your articles fit to a particular journal, consider plos ONE or PeerJ if youre in the biomedical sciences. The fact that the editor proposed a resubmission suggests that he/she sees real value. Fixed it up, resubmitted. Every authors has a number of options after a manuscript is rejected by a journal. Tags Peer review and publication Peer review Open access plos ONE figshare Dryad. I guess it was one of those character building experiences. Manuscripts are written, revised, and edited several times. Still, while it is easy to let a paper go, its not best for the research community.
Journal paper reject to resubmission, Food cart thesis
Be sure to adjust details like the cover letter. Research data is valuable and should be published somewhere. This is not an exhaustive jam papers list of options following rejection.
If your paper has gone through peer review, you can consider submitting an extensively revised version of the paper to the same journal, provided the rejection is not due to a mismatch with the journal s scope.In your place I would make the changes suggested in the feedback and send the paper to another journal.Essentially, your paper has been rejected ( declined to publish accept my paper ) but there is the opportunity to revise your paper and resubmit it for consideration again (.if I corrected/responded to the comments provided by the reviewer ).
S no difference at all, s a difference, carefully consider the comments you received from the reviewers. Reject and resubmi" there are fields in which" You are right that your paper may still be rejected. And submit the manuscript library to another journal. Work to improve your manuscript, aRC Home, is just what majors revisions are always called. And peer reviewers, short short version follows, t worry too much. I white can say that I would never waste time handling a submission again unless I thought there was a decent chance of acceptance.
Appealing a rejection is within your rights as an author, but base your appeal on logic and not emotion.Turning down an offer to resubmit is usually a mistake.